In early February, Fidelity announced, via a
press release,
that they would begin offering investors commission-free trades in 25 iShares
exchange-traded funds (ETFs). In the days since, I have been struck by the fact
that the financial news media lapped up the press release and largely
regurgitated and lauded it without asking some relevant questions and doing
some basic analysis.
I wondered, as I always do when I hear about something
supposedly being offered for free, "What's the catch?" I also wondered how
these commission-free ETFs stacked up against the best competitors.
What's the Catch?
Of course there's a catch - there's always a catch when
you're offered something for free, especially from a public company that has to
report profits to shareholders every three months! (iShares is owned by
Blackrock, a public company).
Many discount brokers, for example, offer you the ability to
buy and sell shares of mutual funds outside their own family/parent company
without paying a transaction fee. How can discount brokers offer commission
free trades when they are directing the money to an outside management company?
Such no transaction fee (NTF) funds are paying a portion of their management
fee to the discount broker on an ongoing basis. I have written extensively
about this over the years and highlighted when it makes sense to use discount
brokers to centralize mutual fund holdings and pay transaction fees and which
NTF funds are worth using. The vast majority of NTF funds are not among the
best available funds because they have higher management fees or worse
management/performance or both.
Now, back to iShares big splash announcement with Fidelity.
iShares denies that they are paying Fidelity a portion of their ETF management
fees. It appears that iShares and Fidelity are doing promotion for one another
- an "I scratch your back if you scratch my back" type agreement. Fidelity gets
to promote that their customers can trade 25 iShares ETFs for free and iShares
gets their ETF program promoted by mutual fund behemoth Fidelity.
Comparing iShares to the Rest
Whenever I analyze any investment such as a mutual fund or
ETF, I examine many factors including how it stacks up to the competition.
While iShares has the largest market share among ETF providers, it offers few
ETFs that I would recommend. In my
roundup of the best index and ETF funds, I
did recommend the iShares Russell 2000 Value Index ETF (IWN). As you can see in
that same article, the No Load Fund Analyst newsletter highlighted a few of
their other ETFs.
Let's examine how the iShares ETFs stack up when you can
trade for free versus the competition. As a first test, I was curious how the
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index ETF compared with Vanguard's Emerging
Markets ETF. Both ETFs are designed to track the same index which I'll come
back to in a moment. As for expenses, the iShares ETF has an annual expense
ratio of 0.72 percent, which is nearly triple that of Vanguard's ETF at 0.27
percent. So, if you invested $5,000 in each of these ETFs, you would pay $36.00
in operating expenses annually for iShares and just $13.50 for Vanguard. And,
remember, you pay operating expenses every year so being able to trade the
iShares ETF for free is hardly worthwhile.
The higher operating expenses of the iShares ETFs are a
significant drawback but there are others. Vanguard's ETFs have done a much
better job tracking their respective indexes and therefore have posted better
performance numbers. Vanguard has far more expertise with designing and
managing index products because they've been at it for decades. With the
emerging market ETF, for example, Vanguard's holds 810 stocks whereas iShares
tries to cut corners and match the index by sampling fewer stocks - it holds
just 425 stocks. As a result, it has strayed from its index far more. For example, in 2009, the index posted a 78.51
percent return whereas the iShares ETF produced a 71.78 percent return, thus
underperforming the index it's supposed to track by 6.72 percent.
So, all in all, investing in iShares ETFs through Fidelity for
their free trading offer isn't worth pursuing. And, remember that you should
always compare ETFs to index funds when deciding which may be best for your
situation. See my article, "
Are Exchange-Traded Funds Superior to Mutual Funds?"